however i will consider other bikes, of courseīut again you seem to suggest a SS is a useless bike on the streets.

and secondly yeah, smaller and lightweight. what i would like is more power first and foremost, but great handling, too. So a ss sounded like the best bike that would give that kind of experience. sometimes i get a bit too out front and have to remember riding with the pack is sometimes safer for all the left turners and driveway exits ahead i am a proactive rider on city streets, i take what is there to take, always safely. but commuting for me means lane splitting, riding around cars ahead of me, filtering, and getting out front. i am small out there, lightweight and quick enough. and if size doesn't matter after you ride a few, i may end up with.who knows? maybe a Monster or Triple, or that new Yamaha? but if you've ever rode a good small scooter around a SoCal city and rode it like a motorcycle, their are some things about it you don't want to lose when riding. 11 were supersportsĪnyway you guys know more about bikes then i. but how can it really be such a beast? i counted 18 bikes in a downtown parking structure recently. but if that is so why do many riders say different, and why do i see so many around the streets of Los Angeles? i mean yes its the performance and handling that interests me. you seem to suggest a Monster or Street Triple are equal to a ss for my purposes and a supersport is not practical in traffic. Click to expand.i am going for small and lightweight, really.

939 supersport bar risers