This is where the player gives up half his bet to forfeit the hand. If the total of the cards exceeds 21 at any point, the player is bust and loses the hand. Late surrender is much more popular, but strategy rules also vary depending on the number of decks in play and whether the dealer hits on soft 17. The player is dealt another card, and they can be dealt more if they wish. I think that you can get an improvement over the worst case by making risk-averse plays, but it still decreases the expected amount of time that your money will last. The player stays with the cards they were dealt. I'm pretty sure that the expected amount of time that your money lasts is inversely proportional to the house edge, so the only way to increase this is to lower the house edge - ie, play perfect basic strategy. So, what's the goal? Probably to make the money last as long as possible. You are going to lose all your money, since you are playing a -EV game. ROR doesn't really make much sense any more. I'll have to check.įor the non-counter, I don't think that this applies. In all other cases, don’t Surrender your hand and follow other parts of the basic strategy chart. In other words, the increased bet size would more than make up for the slight decrease to EV. When should I surrender in Blackjack In most Blackjack versions, you should Surrender if you hold 16 against the dealer’s 9, 10, or 11, as well as if you hold 15 against the dealer’s 10. I think that the idea was that if you lowered the variance on certain plays, you could increase your bet size and have the same ROR, and thus increase the SCORE. I don't remember, though, I will have to check when I get home. IIRC there was something in BJ attack about this. I think it's a little bit more complicated than that.

Should i surrender in blackjack